金門國家公園的生態經濟效益分析
一、研究緣起
依據國家公園法，設立國家公園以保護特有自然風景、野生物及史蹟，具備保育、育樂、研究三大目標，藉由國家公園的設立與經營管理，提供國人直接、間接、選擇使用價值，以及非使用價值。金門國家公園自1995年成立以來致力保存區內珍貴資源，本研究主要目的即評估金門國家公園之生態經濟價值。
二、研究方法及過程
本研究以條件評估法進行金門國家公園的生態經濟價值評估，利用分層隨機抽樣選取到訪金門遊客與當地居民進行人員面訪，調查期間為2008年8月～9月，以Interval Model建立金門國家公園生態經濟價值估計模型。
三、重要發現
推估結果顯示，遊客平均每年每戶最高願意捐款金額約1,427元；金門地區居民平均每年每戶最高願意捐款金額約為1,201元。總計兩模型所估計之金門國家公園生態經濟價值，求得全體國民對金門國家公園之整體生態經濟價值約為107.1億元，以99%的信賴區間估計，約介於105.0億元與109.2億元之間。
Abstract
According to the National Park Act, National Parks are established especially for protecting valuable natural scenic, wildlife and heritage. The economic value of National Park includes direct use value, indirect use value, optional use value and non-use value. Since Kinmen National Park was found in 1995, valuable resources are well conserved. To evaluate the economic values of Kinmen National Park, contingent valuation method was used. Stratified random sampling was applied to collect samples of visitor and residents of Kinmen. Personal interview surveys were conducted during August and September 2008. Economic value model of Kinmen National Park ecological resources conservation was established by interval model. For visitors, estimated average household’s WTP to support the Kinmen National Park ecological resource conservation plan is 1,427 NTD per year per household; estimated average household’s WTP for resident is 1,201 NTD per year per household. The total value of Kinmen National Park ecological resources conservation in Taiwan is 10.7 billion NTD. In the 99% confidence interval, the total value is between 10.5 billion NTD and 10.9 billion NTD. This study suggests some recommendations for immediate strategies including: 1) conducting cost-benefit analysis for ecological resource conservation projects; 2) impact assessment for construction and plan; 3) launching resource quality and species population monitoring programs; 4) evaluating the benefit of revitalization of architecture and community; 5) enhanceing environmental education and interpretation services; and 6) tightening the resident relationship. Long-term strategies suggested as followed: 1) estimating the individual value of three major resources; 2) assessing the economic value of Kinmen National Park ecological resources conservation from space-time aspect; and 3) developing ecological environmental conservation and economic accounting.
依據國家公園法，設立國家公園以保護特有自然風景、野生物及史蹟，具備保育、育樂、研究三大目標，藉由國家公園的設立與經營管理，提供國人直接、間接、選擇使用價值，以及非使用價值。金門國家公園自1995年成立以來致力保存區內珍貴資源，本研究主要目的即評估金門國家公園之生態經濟價值。
二、研究方法及過程
本研究以條件評估法進行金門國家公園的生態經濟價值評估，利用分層隨機抽樣選取到訪金門遊客與當地居民進行人員面訪，調查期間為2008年8月～9月，以Interval Model建立金門國家公園生態經濟價值估計模型。
三、重要發現
推估結果顯示，遊客平均每年每戶最高願意捐款金額約1,427元；金門地區居民平均每年每戶最高願意捐款金額約為1,201元。總計兩模型所估計之金門國家公園生態經濟價值，求得全體國民對金門國家公園之整體生態經濟價值約為107.1億元，以99%的信賴區間估計，約介於105.0億元與109.2億元之間。
Abstract
According to the National Park Act, National Parks are established especially for protecting valuable natural scenic, wildlife and heritage. The economic value of National Park includes direct use value, indirect use value, optional use value and non-use value. Since Kinmen National Park was found in 1995, valuable resources are well conserved. To evaluate the economic values of Kinmen National Park, contingent valuation method was used. Stratified random sampling was applied to collect samples of visitor and residents of Kinmen. Personal interview surveys were conducted during August and September 2008. Economic value model of Kinmen National Park ecological resources conservation was established by interval model. For visitors, estimated average household’s WTP to support the Kinmen National Park ecological resource conservation plan is 1,427 NTD per year per household; estimated average household’s WTP for resident is 1,201 NTD per year per household. The total value of Kinmen National Park ecological resources conservation in Taiwan is 10.7 billion NTD. In the 99% confidence interval, the total value is between 10.5 billion NTD and 10.9 billion NTD. This study suggests some recommendations for immediate strategies including: 1) conducting cost-benefit analysis for ecological resource conservation projects; 2) impact assessment for construction and plan; 3) launching resource quality and species population monitoring programs; 4) evaluating the benefit of revitalization of architecture and community; 5) enhanceing environmental education and interpretation services; and 6) tightening the resident relationship. Long-term strategies suggested as followed: 1) estimating the individual value of three major resources; 2) assessing the economic value of Kinmen National Park ecological resources conservation from space-time aspect; and 3) developing ecological environmental conservation and economic accounting.